<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing Scribe</title>
	<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/</link>
	<description>The official AllPeers blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5768</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5768</guid>
		<description>I'm afraid that's exactly what I'm telling you. I just wrote a massive doc for the blog (stay tuned) and I really don't find it that bad. There are some inconvenience around typing HTML, but it's still better than typing some other format and then converting it &lt;strong&gt;into&lt;/strong&gt; HTML. Of course, I'm now using Scribe and I also use &lt;a href="http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/index.php?showtopic=2796" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid that&#8217;s exactly what I&#8217;m telling you. I just wrote a massive doc for the blog (stay tuned) and I really don&#8217;t find it that bad. There are some inconvenience around typing HTML, but it&#8217;s still better than typing some other format and then converting it <strong>into</strong> HTML. Of course, I&#8217;m now using Scribe and I also use <a href="http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/index.php?showtopic=2796" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5767</link>
		<author>Julia</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5767</guid>
		<description>Please please don't tell me you'd prefer to write longish docs in a form field rather than a text editor. That's taking devheadedness too far! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please don&#8217;t tell me you&#8217;d prefer to write longish docs in a form field rather than a text editor. That&#8217;s taking devheadedness too far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5766</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5766</guid>
		<description>Well for one thing: Word? Yuk! ;-) Plus formatting doesn't get preserved that way, and I like to format as I go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well for one thing: Word? Yuk! <img src='http://www.allpeers.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Plus formatting doesn&#8217;t get preserved that way, and I like to format as I go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5765</link>
		<author>Julia</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/07/26/fixing-scribe/#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>Cool fix and would be particularly useful if it works with many fielded forms. But for a blog - rough draft in Word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool fix and would be particularly useful if it works with many fielded forms. But for a blog - rough draft in Word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
