<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: While You Were Sleeping</title>
	<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/29/while-you-were-sleeping/</link>
	<description>The official AllPeers blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Newcybertech Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dynamics of Digg</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/29/while-you-were-sleeping/#comment-7260</link>
		<author>Newcybertech Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dynamics of Digg</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 05:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/29/while-you-were-sleeping/#comment-7260</guid>
		<description>[...] from Mashable*Digg, the social news ranking site, has been getting a lot of coverage lately. It started with Alex Bosworth’s excellent Dynamics of Digg post, where he suggested that there are 5 types of Digg users. Richard MacManus summarized his points n&#8230;   » While You Were Sleeping from Peer Pressure We posted the new AllPeers screenshots last Thursday, but apparently it took a few days for them to percolate through the blogosphere. As it happens, I set off on Monday for a week of vacationing in London, and left my laptop at home under the assumpti&#8230; [Read More] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] from Mashable*Digg, the social news ranking site, has been getting a lot of coverage lately. It started with Alex Bosworth’s excellent Dynamics of Digg post, where he suggested that there are 5 types of Digg users. Richard MacManus summarized his points n&#8230;   » While You Were Sleeping from Peer Pressure We posted the new AllPeers screenshots last Thursday, but apparently it took a few days for them to percolate through the blogosphere. As it happens, I set off on Monday for a week of vacationing in London, and left my laptop at home under the assumpti&#8230; [Read More] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heavyboots</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/29/while-you-were-sleeping/#comment-6235</link>
		<author>heavyboots</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/29/while-you-were-sleeping/#comment-6235</guid>
		<description>FWIW, a good friend tells me that disabling keep-alive in httpd.conf had a huge effect on how fast their server could process requests (I think they were up over 450 connections per second when they had to implement this). This may be special case that applies only if you're running MySQL backend--MySQL was bogging more than apache at the time but the apache connections were staying alive while awaiting a response from MySQL. Now they're averaging more like 50 connections a second max with the same user load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, a good friend tells me that disabling keep-alive in httpd.conf had a huge effect on how fast their server could process requests (I think they were up over 450 connections per second when they had to implement this). This may be special case that applies only if you&#8217;re running MySQL backend&#8211;MySQL was bogging more than apache at the time but the apache connections were staying alive while awaiting a response from MySQL. Now they&#8217;re averaging more like 50 connections a second max with the same user load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RG</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/29/while-you-were-sleeping/#comment-6196</link>
		<author>RG</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/29/while-you-were-sleeping/#comment-6196</guid>
		<description>Excited by this and I do realize the positives of Firefox but, minus the BitTorrent client, the question asked on the screenshots post about 'initiating file transfer via IM' is nevertheless a good one

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excited by this and I do realize the positives of Firefox but, minus the BitTorrent client, the question asked on the screenshots post about &#8216;initiating file transfer via IM&#8217; is nevertheless a good one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
