<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Extensions and the New Web Paradigm</title>
	<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/</link>
	<description>The official AllPeers blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Gentry</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6409</link>
		<author>Josh Gentry</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6409</guid>
		<description>On the structured data argument; Have you read Shirky's &lt;a href="//www.shirky.com/writings/evolve.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;In Praise of Evolvable Systems&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.shirky.com/writings/semantic_syllogism.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Semantic Web, Syllogism, and Worldview&lt;/a&gt;?  Powerful arguments for unstructured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the structured data argument; Have you read Shirky&#8217;s <a href="//www.shirky.com/writings/evolve.html" rel="nofollow">In Praise of Evolvable Systems</a> and <a href="http://www.shirky.com/writings/semantic_syllogism.html" rel="nofollow">The Semantic Web, Syllogism, and Worldview</a>?  Powerful arguments for unstructured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FF user</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6408</link>
		<author>FF user</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6408</guid>
		<description>as a very-skeptical-about-adding-a-P2P-thing-in-FireFox  i'm still far from convinced that it's a good idea.

First it's like giving all the Anti-FF cie. a woodstick to beat us. "Looook that FireFox monster can even help terrorists share their illegal MP3's " (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a very-skeptical-about-adding-a-P2P-thing-in-FireFox  i&#8217;m still far from convinced that it&#8217;s a good idea.</p>
<p>First it&#8217;s like giving all the Anti-FF cie. a woodstick to beat us. &#8220;Looook that FireFox monster can even help terrorists share their illegal MP3&#8217;s &#8221; (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dumping Ground</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6406</link>
		<author>The Dumping Ground</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6406</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Does "Web Paradigm" Mean, Anyway? (Part 4)&lt;/strong&gt;

First of all, sorry for the delay in posting this last part.  I've had a great majority of it written for some time, but - as Faulkner once wrote - life intervened.  I know there has been a trackback to part 3, and I have intentionally forgone reading...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Does &#8220;Web Paradigm&#8221; Mean, Anyway? (Part 4)</strong></p>
<p>First of all, sorry for the delay in posting this last part.  I&#8217;ve had a great majority of it written for some time, but - as Faulkner once wrote - life intervened.  I know there has been a trackback to part 3, and I have intentionally forgone reading&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bits and Buzz      &#187; P2P For Web 2.0: Brainstorming</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6388</link>
		<author>Bits and Buzz      &#187; P2P For Web 2.0: Brainstorming</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6388</guid>
		<description>[...] one client, similar to Groove, but geared for the consumer market.  Related links:   Great Allpeers article (from Allpeers&#8217; blog) about extension [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] one client, similar to Groove, but geared for the consumer market.  Related links:   Great Allpeers article (from Allpeers&#8217; blog) about extension [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6387</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6387</guid>
		<description>Yes, but there is active work underway to fix this so that all Mozilla-based apps share the same runtime.

In any case, I think that the advantages of browser integration go deeper than just using Mozilla for many types of apps. Sometimes you want to press the back button in the browser and return to a screen that isn't a webpage at all, for example. This can only work if the app in question is hosted in the same window as the normal web browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but there is active work underway to fix this so that all Mozilla-based apps share the same runtime.</p>
<p>In any case, I think that the advantages of browser integration go deeper than just using Mozilla for many types of apps. Sometimes you want to press the back button in the browser and return to a screen that isn&#8217;t a webpage at all, for example. This can only work if the app in question is hosted in the same window as the normal web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwarden</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6384</link>
		<author>mwarden</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/01/17/firefox-extensions-and-the-new-web-paradigm/#comment-6384</guid>
		<description>If you ran it as standalone using XULRunner, does that mean if one had your app, FF, and Thunderbird running, there would be (approx) 3x the memory usage as if they were running off the same instance of the engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ran it as standalone using XULRunner, does that mean if one had your app, FF, and Thunderbird running, there would be (approx) 3x the memory usage as if they were running off the same instance of the engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
