http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/02/21/blogging-the-chasm/ The official AllPeers blog Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:34:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/02/21/blogging-the-chasm/#comment-6671 Matt Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:37:30 +0000 http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/02/21/blogging-the-chasm/#comment-6671 Actually I think that a lot more people link to your blog, in general. I'm starting to think that my use of Bloglines subscribers as a proxy for this blog's popularity is wrongheaded. I often wish that I got more links, and that might be a more appropriate "marketing focus". Actually I think that a lot more people link to your blog, in general. I’m starting to think that my use of Bloglines subscribers as a proxy for this blog’s popularity is wrongheaded. I often wish that I got more links, and that might be a more appropriate “marketing focus”.

]]> http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/02/21/blogging-the-chasm/#comment-6623 Greg Yardley Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:42:18 +0000 http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2006/02/21/blogging-the-chasm/#comment-6623 The discrepancy comes from that whole Google Click-to-Call beta I spotted in November or so. That one off-the-chart post really skews the numbers - got a ton of links from it but hardly any subscribers. The discrepancy comes from that whole Google Click-to-Call beta I spotted in November or so. That one off-the-chart post really skews the numbers - got a ton of links from it but hardly any subscribers.

]]>