<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Wikipedia Itself Be a Google Killer?</title>
	<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/01/22/could-wikipedia-itself-be-a-google-killer/</link>
	<description>The official AllPeers blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: lee perez</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/01/22/could-wikipedia-itself-be-a-google-killer/#comment-48474</link>
		<author>lee perez</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/01/22/could-wikipedia-itself-be-a-google-killer/#comment-48474</guid>
		<description>im really not that web savvy, but you got to hand it to wikipedia coming up with such an innovative concept that beats google, and the rest. that's what happens when you put in people first, instead of profits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im really not that web savvy, but you got to hand it to wikipedia coming up with such an innovative concept that beats google, and the rest. that&#8217;s what happens when you put in people first, instead of profits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulu</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/01/22/could-wikipedia-itself-be-a-google-killer/#comment-48323</link>
		<author>Lulu</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/01/22/could-wikipedia-itself-be-a-google-killer/#comment-48323</guid>
		<description>The last two years or so I've been frequently forgetting to search Google, even if I could not find what I was looking for on Wikipedia. Firefox played a big part in this: just typing "wp "; it's never been so easy. However, I also use Google a lot, but that's because I'm too lazy to type in the TLD (e.g. I type "last" instead of "last.fm"). 

Btw, there is already something like Wikiasari from Jimbo Wales: Wikiseek. 
http://www.wikiseek.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last two years or so I&#8217;ve been frequently forgetting to search Google, even if I could not find what I was looking for on Wikipedia. Firefox played a big part in this: just typing &#8220;wp &#8220;; it&#8217;s never been so easy. However, I also use Google a lot, but that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m too lazy to type in the TLD (e.g. I type &#8220;last&#8221; instead of &#8220;last.fm&#8221;). </p>
<p>Btw, there is already something like Wikiasari from Jimbo Wales: Wikiseek.<br />
<a href="http://www.wikiseek.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikiseek.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funTomas</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/01/22/could-wikipedia-itself-be-a-google-killer/#comment-48285</link>
		<author>funTomas</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/01/22/could-wikipedia-itself-be-a-google-killer/#comment-48285</guid>
		<description>I must agree, WikiPedia makes sense. However, I disagree with the approach oscillation. Today, I can distinguish the cases Google's searching is best fit for as well as those cases looking'em up in the Wiki is best much. See, I use Wikipedia to look up a certain fact. Quite often I'm pleased to find a complex explanation, new fact related to what I'm looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree, WikiPedia makes sense. However, I disagree with the approach oscillation. Today, I can distinguish the cases Google&#8217;s searching is best fit for as well as those cases looking&#8217;em up in the Wiki is best much. See, I use Wikipedia to look up a certain fact. Quite often I&#8217;m pleased to find a complex explanation, new fact related to what I&#8217;m looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
