<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Firefox Market Share Matter?</title>
	<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/06/18/does-firefox-market-share-matter/</link>
	<description>The official AllPeers blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: enefekt</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/06/18/does-firefox-market-share-matter/#comment-72470</link>
		<author>enefekt</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/06/18/does-firefox-market-share-matter/#comment-72470</guid>
		<description>All that is so true. So you have the platform which isn't really being given proper attention as a product, and an indifference to getting as much market share as possible.

Then you look at a company like Adobe. What's their motivation? Selling authoring tools and IDEs and such. At least it's a motivation. And they are invested in their platform as a product. And intend for it to be used by application developers. (Then add in the open source bits, like the Tamarin donation, open sourcing Flex 3 frameworks and SDKs, WebKit) And they know how to get software on other people's machines. (Shared runtimes)

To me, for application development, this is serious competition. I think it will be interesting determine which platform is better for various types of applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that is so true. So you have the platform which isn&#8217;t really being given proper attention as a product, and an indifference to getting as much market share as possible.</p>
<p>Then you look at a company like Adobe. What&#8217;s their motivation? Selling authoring tools and IDEs and such. At least it&#8217;s a motivation. And they are invested in their platform as a product. And intend for it to be used by application developers. (Then add in the open source bits, like the Tamarin donation, open sourcing Flex 3 frameworks and SDKs, WebKit) And they know how to get software on other people&#8217;s machines. (Shared runtimes)</p>
<p>To me, for application development, this is serious competition. I think it will be interesting determine which platform is better for various types of applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Hauner</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/06/18/does-firefox-market-share-matter/#comment-72368</link>
		<author>Adam Hauner</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/06/18/does-firefox-market-share-matter/#comment-72368</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should put favicon link to your page's head section, unlinked favicon is probably only seen in MSIE and Firefox, but for example not in SeaMonkey.

Code:
&#60;link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico"  type="image/x-icon"/&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should put favicon link to your page&#8217;s head section, unlinked favicon is probably only seen in MSIE and Firefox, but for example not in SeaMonkey.</p>
<p>Code:<br />
&lt;link rel=&#8221;shortcut icon&#8221; href=&#8221;/favicon.ico&#8221;  type=&#8221;image/x-icon&#8221;/&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
