<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Themself</title>
	<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/10/22/themself/</link>
	<description>The official AllPeers blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Anjelina</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/10/22/themself/#comment-312197</link>
		<author>Anjelina</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/10/22/themself/#comment-312197</guid>
		<description>I’m undecided &lt;a href="http://www.sexpornoizle.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;sexpornoizle.org&lt;/a&gt; about themself. One one hand, it makes it looks singularer &lt;a href="http://www.sexpornoizle.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;porno izle&lt;/a&gt; (this is definitely not a word) which helps with the potential ambiguity of singular they</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m undecided <a href="http://www.sexpornoizle.org" rel="nofollow">sexpornoizle.org</a> about themself. One one hand, it makes it looks singularer <a href="http://www.sexpornoizle.org" rel="nofollow">porno izle</a> (this is definitely not a word) which helps with the potential ambiguity of singular they</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/10/22/themself/#comment-310226</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/10/22/themself/#comment-310226</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I'm undecided about themself. One one hand, it makes it looks singularer (this is definitely not a word) which helps with the potential ambiguity of singular they. On the other hand, you (hypothetical you, another underappreciated pronoun) treat "they" as plural in almost every other way: you say "they are" not "they is". So is it "they are doing it themself"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;m undecided about themself. One one hand, it makes it looks singularer (this is definitely not a word) which helps with the potential ambiguity of singular they. On the other hand, you (hypothetical you, another underappreciated pronoun) treat &#8220;they&#8221; as plural in almost every other way: you say &#8220;they are&#8221; not &#8220;they is&#8221;. So is it &#8220;they are doing it themself&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/10/22/themself/#comment-182253</link>
		<author>BOB</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/10/22/themself/#comment-182253</guid>
		<description>I had the same experience just now while proofreading a translation.

I will be using it too, as it sounds the most natural of the available options in the circumstances.

You have my full (belated) support!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same experience just now while proofreading a translation.</p>
<p>I will be using it too, as it sounds the most natural of the available options in the circumstances.</p>
<p>You have my full (belated) support!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
